The Supreme Court of South Carolina on Thursday abolished common-law marriage, citing an overwhelming national trend.
The court came to this conclusion reviewing a case that hinged on the “mutual assent” requirement to prove a common-law marriage. In its review, the court chose to refine the test for legal marriages.
Justice Kaye Hearn focused her opinion on societal norms, which have shifted away from moral paternalism. Marital status is no longer a necessary measure or protection of inheritance rights or child support, and the fact that legal marriage ceremonies are inexpensive and accessible indicates that the choice to not marry (despite cohabitation) is an intentional choice.
Citing Obergefell v. Hodges, the fact that the right to marry is a fundamental constitutional right led the court to conclude that “the right to remain unmarried is equally weighty, particularly when combined with our admonitions that a person cannot enter into such a union accidently or unwittingly.”
The state, as a result, adopted a bright-line rule that requires all future legal marriages “in South Carolina to obtain a lawful license.”
As a result of the ruling, South Carolina leaves a dwindling pool of states that still have a common-law marriage. Only nine states, including Texas, Utah and Colorado, and the District of Columbia have definitive legislation that outlines common-law marriage requirements.
The new ruling does not affect common-law marriages that are already in effect.
Note:- We try our level best to avoid any kind of abusive content posted by users. Kindly report to us if you notice any. This report may be copied from a news/channel/magazine/blog/site for knowledge sharing, where PathLegal DISCLAIM any ownership of the content posted and offer NO warranty about the data. In case of any objection, please do write to [email protected]